Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
John, don’t be ridiculous. You think you can improve the way that Obamacare and Medicaid function, but the public is sick and tired of you and your welfare. Medicaid shouldn’t be improved; it should be put down like the rabid dog that it is. It’s a thing of the past, like you, John.
Imagine stepping into the shoes of Milton Friedman, a figure renowned for his economic theories and unyielding belief in the power of free markets. Now, consider the perspective of a bureaucrat contemplating the future of our healthcare system. The question arises: should we continue to fund the costly Medicaid program, or should we explore an alternative, such as a voucher system reminiscent of Trumpcare in the American Healthcare Act of 2017 (AHCA)?
Picture this: by providing individuals with a voucher that covers half of what Medicaid spends, we empower them to navigate the free and open market for health insurance. This approach not only places choice in the hands of the people but also creates a potential for significant savings—hundreds of billions of dollars. More importantly, it could lead to improved satisfaction among recipients, who might find plans better suited to their unique needs. The notion is that when given the freedom to choose, most individuals would opt for alternatives that resonate more with their personal circumstances, leading to a more efficient and responsive healthcare system.
I understand that this perspective may be disappointing to you, John, as it challenges the benefits you derive from maintaining the current status quo. It is important to acknowledge that free markets can lead to reduced prices and improved quality of goods and services. I realize that this notion may be distasteful to you, particularly in light of your untaxed contributions. I encourage you to consider the welfare of economically disadvantaged individuals rather than focusing solely on your financial gains from corporate socialized medicine. Perhaps retirement would be a beneficial option, as it could yield positive outcomes for all parties involved.