Menu
The Goodman Institute Health Blog
  • Home
  • Authors
    • Devon Herrick, Ph.D.
    • John C. Goodman
  • Popular Topics
    • Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare
    • Consumer-Driven Health Care
      • Affordable Care Act
      • Cost of Healthcare
      • COVID-19 and Public Health
      • Doctors & Hospitals
      • Public Insurance
      • Policy & Legislation
    • Direct Primary Care
    • Health Economics & Costs
      • Drug Prices & Regulations
      • Health Insurance
      • Health Reform
    • Medical Tourism
    • Telemedicine
    • Medicare
      • Single-Payer/Medicare-for-All
  • Goodman Institute
  • Contact
  • Search
The Goodman Institute Health Blog

Obamacare Doesn’t Want Competition from Better Insurance Plans

Posted on July 8, 2023 by Devon Herrick

Have you ever noticed that sometimes people say one thing when they actually mean another? The Biden Administration is passing regulations limiting short term medical coverage to protect consumers, but it’s really to protect Obamacare. The Biden Administration announced a final rule limiting the type of health insurance Americans are allowed to buy:

HHS, the Treasury Department and the Department of Labor issued proposed rules on Friday that clamp down on short-term limited duration health plans, which offer cheap but sparse coverage that Democrats deride as “junk insurance.” The rule, which is meant to protect consumers and bolster the Obamacare exchange, would overturn a 2018 Trump-era regulation and satisfies liberal lawmakers and patient groups who have demanded the administration act since its first days in the White House.

Politico also had this to say:

President Joe Biden wants skimpy, short-term health coverage to last no more than four months, reversing a Trump-era regulation.

All this time I thought the uninsured were a problem, not people who wanted to buy health insurance other than Obamacare.

“Short-term plans are intended to provide temporary coverage as people transition from one source of coverage to another,” said Neera Tanden, White House domestic policy adviser, on a call with reporters Thursday. “Under the previous administration, however, companies were able to take advantage of loopholes and sell junk insurance for much longer than intended.”

Have there been a lot of complaints about short-term medical plans? The only complaint I’ve heard are people with Obamacare.

Short-term plans do not have to meet the same requirements as a health insurance plan sold on the Obamacare insurance exchanges. These requirements can include coverage of pre-existing conditions and certain essential health benefits such as prescription drugs.

Supposedly, this was among several policy ideas to lower the cost of health care (by making us buy more expensive health coverage):

The Biden Administration doesn’t want you to have the insurance you prefer, calling it junk insurance. Speaking of junk insurance, have I told you about my experience with Obamacare? Last year I had a policy through a company I had never heard of. I never found a suitable doctor who participated in the plan. That is, I literally got no use out of the plan. All medical care I received was paying cash outside of the plan. At the end of the year I was notified the company was leaving the market in my state. Later I read the company was more or less told by the state to leave. The premiums were still between $7,000 and $8,000. I wonder if I can get a $7,000 refund for having junk health coverage? This year I have Cigna, but I have to spend nearly $9,000 before it covers anything and the annual premiums are nearly that much. Yet, the Biden Administration wants to take away any other option except going bare, which at my age is something of a risk.

The paragraph below tells the real reason the Biden Administration wants get rid of short term medical plans:

Short-term plans are likely to offer some healthier people lower premiums (because the plans include reduced benefits and cover less costly populations), and thus will lure healthy enrollees away from the individual and small-group markets and leave a costlier group behind. This dynamic, known as adverse selection, raises premiums for traditional, more comprehensive health coverage and undermines ACA protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Meanwhile, healthy people who enroll in these plans may find themselves facing gaps in coverage and exposed to catastrophic costs if they get sick and need care.

Basically, Obamacare is so unpopular that the Biden Administration must limit your options to Obamacare and subsidize it get Americans to buy it.

3 thoughts on “Obamacare Doesn’t Want Competition from Better Insurance Plans”

  1. Ron MSA King says:
    July 8, 2023 at 2:13 pm

    Billionaire Pete Ricketts picked health insurance for Nebraska State employees that costs $35,484 a year per family! Trump’s Plan, or STM, for a 30-year-old couple and a child in Lincoln, NE is $231 per month. Everybody is lying through their teeth saying the Trump Plan is only 80% less than employer-sponsored insurance but 90% is much more accurate.

    This big spending Ricketts is now running for US Senate and refuses to endorse Trump! The last we know Ricketts was spending $7,300 a year for one person on Medicaid in 2019, the last year they will give use data on. Crooks are everywhere in Government healthcare and the last thing they need is some example how cheap insurance really is. That’s way over 90% less!

    Loading...
    Reply
  2. Ron Greiner MSA King says:
    July 8, 2023 at 2:49 pm

    Devon, I ordered radio advertising yesterday and included a script for Trump’s Short-Term-Medical (STM) and then I discover Biden is calling us JUNK! So this morning I wrote a new 60-second spot especially for Dementia Joe. YOU get 1st look. I don’t think I’m too extreme.

    Male Voice: Biden is calling Trump’s low-cost insurance – Junk!
    Girl Voice: $35,000 a year per family for Nebraska State employee insurance!
    Male Voice: 30-year-old parents and a son can get Trump’s Plan in Lincoln for $250 a month!
    Male Voice: State employees they’re share is $617 a month
    Girl Voice: State employees Save over $300/month and taxpayer save thousands! Some Junk!
    Male Voice: [GRAB Biden’s JUNK] – toll free – 844-Save201
    Girl Voice: Obamacare is herding farmers onto HMOs like cattle (MOOooo) (SOUND EFFECT)
    Male Voice: Federal employees pay $637 a month for Blue Cross PPO! (Actually $695/mo)
    Girl Voice: Farmers, ranchers and Government employees save call 844-Save201
    Male Voice: Save America – [Grab Biden’s Junk] – Save201.com
    Male Voice: Move’em Out! (SCREAMING)(Whip) (Rawhide!)

    Of course the sound effect of MOOoooing and Whips Cracking and Head’em up Rawhide will make or break this commercial. It is short enough to focus on Sound Effects!

    Loading...
    Reply
  3. Bob Hertz says:
    July 9, 2023 at 2:20 am

    In order to get a family insurance premium down to $250 a month, I think you would need a deductible of $10,000-$15,000 plus coinsurance at close to 50% after the deductible up to another $10,000 or so.

    Which may be fine for some consumers, I grant that, but policies which are this skimpy become “fresh meat” for the Biden cause when you get an ugly claims story,

    Loading...
    Reply

Join the conversation.Cancel reply

For many years, our health care blog was the only free enterprise health policy blog on the internet. Then, when the NCPA closed its doors, the health blog stopped as well.

During this five-year hiatus no one else has come forward to claim the space. So, my colleagues and I have decided to restart the blog in connection with the Goodman Institute. We invite you and others to use this forum to share your views.

John C. Goodman,

Visit www.goodmaninstitute.org

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 41 other subscribers

Popular Topics

©2026 The Goodman Institute Health Blog | Website by Lexicom
%d