Menu
The Goodman Institute Health Blog
  • Home
  • Authors
    • Devon Herrick, Ph.D.
    • John C. Goodman
  • Popular Topics
    • Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare
    • Consumer-Driven Health Care
      • Affordable Care Act
      • Cost of Healthcare
      • COVID-19 and Public Health
      • Doctors & Hospitals
      • Public Insurance
      • Policy & Legislation
    • Direct Primary Care
    • Health Economics & Costs
      • Drug Prices & Regulations
      • Health Insurance
      • Health Reform
    • Medical Tourism
    • Telemedicine
    • Medicare
      • Single-Payer/Medicare-for-All
  • Goodman Institute
  • Contact
The Goodman Institute Health Blog

Thursday Links

Posted on May 18, 2023May 18, 2023 by John C. Goodman

The AMA’s Advancing Health Equity guide is a joke. But after the laughter dies, it is also very sad.

British Columbia to send thousands of Canadian cancer patients to Washington state for treatment.

Paragon: Medicare’s venture into “value based care” has done little except add administrative burden and a set of quality metrics that are easily gamed and don’t translate into better or more efficient care.

Trump’s executive order allowing employers to fund individually owned health insurance is taking hold.

4 thoughts on “Thursday Links”

  1. John Fembup says:
    May 18, 2023 at 9:30 pm

    Somehow, the British Columbia situation reminds me of this old story.

    Two friends meet for lunch at a restaurant. After their meal, one said “The food here is really bad.” The other friend answered “Yes it is – and the portions are so small”

    B.C. cannot meet its resident’s demand for cancer care. But – it’s free.

    Loading...
    Reply
  2. Bob Hertz says:
    May 20, 2023 at 7:53 am

    I have studied the Canadian health care system fairly extensively. The main problem is not they are single-payer….the problem is that they are fiscally conservative single payer.

    Gearing up to fight cancer is hugely expensive — from oncologists to radiologists to technicians to imaging machines to new drugs.

    Canadian voters have supported balanced budgets and few new taxes. There just is not the money to solve the problem.

    Loading...
    Reply
    1. John Fembup says:
      May 20, 2023 at 7:55 pm

      “the problem is that they are fiscally conservative single payer.”

      Well, Bob I agree the interference of government in the delivery and financing of medical care in Canada is a problem.

      But it’s not “the problem”.

      Loading...
  3. Bob Hertz says:
    May 22, 2023 at 7:29 am

    John, thanks for your comments as always. Your inference here is that without government interference, the private sector would create a flourishing market for cancer care.

    Maybe yes, maybe not.

    Here in the USA, would we have so much investment in cancer care if the providers were not sure that Medicare would cover more or less anything and pay more or less whatever prices were charged? This is true for drugs, imaging, et al.

    Most aspects of cancer care get paid in Medicare Parts B and D. These benefits have no dedicated taxes, and they are a huge contributor to our annual budget deficits.

    And this may be all right. But it backs up my point that a generous public sector is a key part of cancer care.

    Loading...
    Reply

Join the conversation.Cancel reply

For many years, our health care blog was the only free enterprise health policy blog on the internet. Then, when the NCPA closed its doors, the health blog stopped as well.

During this five-year hiatus no one else has come forward to claim the space. So, my colleagues and I have decided to restart the blog in connection with the Goodman Institute. We invite you and others to use this forum to share your views.

John C. Goodman,

Visit www.goodmaninstitute.org

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 36 other subscribers

Popular Topics

©2025 The Goodman Institute Health Blog | Website by Lexicom
%d