“The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes …Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” –Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
Is it possible that site-neutral spending could unintentionally raise non-hospital prices, either through relaxed competition or by encouraging hospitals to buy external facilities in order to raise prices?
“The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes …Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” –Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
That’s scary.
Is it possible that site-neutral spending could unintentionally raise non-hospital prices, either through relaxed competition or by encouraging hospitals to buy external facilities in order to raise prices?