Republicans have wanted to tie welfare benefits to work requirements for many years. One such proposal is to require some form of work in return for Medicaid benefits. Democrats opposed such measures, with the Obama and Biden Administrations blocking most applications. George is the only state so far with work requirements tied to Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act. Critics argue that the program is boosting inefficiencies and slowing down enrollment in other welfare programs, like food stamps and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. In Georgia employment verification for Medicaid eligibility and enrollment has been slow.
Category: Affordable Care Act
Monday Links
- Epidemiologists estimate that Plasmodium, the parasite transmitted through the female mosquito vector, has claimed the lives of 5 percent of the humans who’ve ever existed. Even today, it kills someone under the age of five every two minutes.
- Scott Sumner: industrial policy has never worked.
- Myth exposed: Mama Cass didn’t die by choking on a ham sandwich.
- Henderson: Economists are less selfish than the average person.
- In 2023, food stamp benefits did not cover the cost of a meal in 99 percent of counties.
- Intermittent fasting works for me. But a NEJM study says it is no better than counting calories.
Record-Breaking 2024 Open Enrollment Period Under the Affordable Care Act
21.3 million Americans with high (and likely unaffordable) deductibles and narrow access to doctors and drugs. The vast majority of whom are having their premiums paid, in whole or in part, by taxpayers. It’s worth pointing out that many of the new enrollees are likely people who did not enroll when the premium was 2-4% of their income but do when coverage is given to them for free. The data below does not yet have 2024 (breakdown by income has not been released yet), but I’d bet the trend holds.
Should Employers Fund Rare Disease Research and Therapies?
Included in Friday Links (November 10) was the title, “Would coverage for gene therapies make employer-based health insurance unaffordable?” That raises an important question: How much should employers (and employees) be required to pay for hyper-expensive therapies very few people need? A related question: should the purpose of employee health coverage be to recruit and retain workers or fund rare disease research and therapies?